Pages

Showing posts with label Scientology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scientology. Show all posts

Friday, October 14, 2011

Sarah and Greta and John: The Scientology Connection- Part 3/3

The Church
Like her husband, Greta Van Susteren's support of Scientology is well-documented. She has told interviewers that she likes “the ethics” Liking Scientology for its ethics is about the same as liking Jerusalem for its barbecued pork rib restaurants. 
There are, in fact, a lot of celebrities who follow the doctrines. Many come from the entertainment industry and some are more open about it than others. It might be assumed that many of the celebrities have a casual relationship with their professed religion, no more than a passing curiosity, rather than a commitment.
In the case of Van Susteren and Coale, it is a much more than that. The one-time top accountant at Coale & Van Susteren, Loretta Miscavige, is the mother of the leader of the Church of Scientology, David Miscavige. According to one source, Susteren is
"a major donor to the Church, too, although her sizable donations in the late '90s were reportedly listed under the name "Greta Conway." (Conway is her middle name.) Van Susteren and Coale are tight with a number of other high-profile L. Ron Hubbard fans. Tom Cruise once considered making a movie about Coale's legal exploits. And Coale and Van Susteren's firm represented fellow Scientologist Lisa Marie Presley when she divorced Michael Jackson."
Another, more serious charge against Van Susteren is that she has worked behind the scenes to protect the image of the Church. According to one Graham E. Berry, an attorney that has litigated against Scientology:
CNN, the news corporation, decided to expose the Applied Scholastics misrepresentation that it was not part of the church hierarchy. However, one of CNN’s legal commentators, Greta Van Susteran, is a Scientologist. She went to work to convince CNN that they would be subjecting themselves to defamation liability if they published this major exposé on Scientology, and Scientology executives and investigators went to work on the senior management of CNN to convince them that should not publish this major exposé on Scientology.
CNN teams had spent many months talking to people about Scientology. Some of these people being former Scientologists who had never publicly spoken out about Scientology. In doing so, they put their lives at great risk, because Scientology would react through private investigators to disturb and destroy their personal and business relationships. And so they were betrayed and put at great risk when Scientology operatives managed to convince CNN to cancel this exposé, which I have described.

Just in case you’ve never heard of Scientology- (you really do need to get out more, you know) I will try to give you a very quick background summary.
The first Church of Scientology was set up in Camden, New Jersey in 1953 by American science fiction author, L. Ron Hubbard and his wife. His goal was to create a belief system aimed at, as Hubbard stated, "A civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to rise to greater heights, are the aims of Scientology." Nothing wrong with that. However, after that, things get a little more strange. According to Wikipedia:
Hubbard said that the modern-day science fiction genre of space opera is merely an unconscious recollection of real events that took place millions of years ago. These events include the story of Xenu, the ruler of the Galactic Confederacy who brought billions of frozen people to Earth 75 million years ago, stacked them around volcanoes and blew them up with hydrogen bombs, creating swarms of disembodied alien souls known as Body Thetans. Xenu is only one element of Scientologist beliefs in alien civilizations. Such doctrines have existed in Scientology virtually since its beginning: In the 1950s Hubbard wrote and lectured about civilizations such as Helatrobus, Espinol and Arslychus, and in the 1960s he introduced Xenu's Galactic Confederacy. He described repeated instances of their using brainwashing implants on hapless beings. He also spoke of alien invasions of Earth, such as that carried out around 6235 BCE by the Fifth Invader Force, who were "very strange insect-like creature[s] with unthinkably horrible hands."
Well, ok..then. Of course, you have to invest a LOT of money and spend a LOT of time inside the organization to prepare yourself to receive that kind of truth. 
But you might well ask, is this really a religion or..something else? The United States government apparently thinks it is a religion, equally as valid as the Christianity, Islam and Judaism. 
After a crackdown on the Church in 1967, the IRS stripped the Scientology Church of its tax exempt status, deeming it a commercial enterprise. For the next 26 years, the church would sue again and again to regain its tax-exempt status. The case was finally resolved in 1993 at a cost of 12.5 million- reportedly far less than the IRS had intitially demanded. This victory for the Church was seen as proof that Scientology was a accepted religion by the government. As Cliff Kincaid and Sherrie Gossett put it, writing for Accuracy in Media,
The IRS finally granted Scientology its desired status under President Bill Clinton, the recipient of massive donations from the Hollywood glitterati.
Scientology's leader David Miscavige
All of this could be dismissed as just another crazy aspect of American culture. However, as TIME magazine reported back in 1991
In reality the church is a hugely profitable global racket that survives by intimidating members and critics in a Mafia-like manner. At times during the past decade, prosecutions against Scientology seemed to be curbing its menace. Eleven top Scientologists, including Hubbard's wife, were sent to prison in the early 1980s for infiltrating, burglarizing and wiretapping more than 100 private and government agencies in attempts to block their investigations.
The article goes on to say:
The group, which boasts 700 centers in 65 countries, threatens to become more insidious and pervasive than ever. Scientology is trying to go mainstream, a strategy that has sparked a renewed law-enforcement campaign against the church. Many of the group's followers have been accused of committing financial scams, while the church is busy attracting the unwary through a wide array of front groups in such businesses as publishing, consulting, health care and even remedial education.
Seduction and Infiltration
According to a Gawker story from 2009, back in 1986, John P. Coale was the author behind a plan to infiltrate Washington D.C., using friendly politicians to further the cult’s agenda. And It is not an easily-dismissed conspiracy theory. The memo by Coale carefully lays his methodical approach. 
The idea was to launch a political action committee that would attract donations from Scientologists but could be plausibly distanced from the cult, which claims to be a church and therefore barred from engaging directly in political activities....

The PAC was to be called FLAGG PAC, which stood for "Freedom, Liberty, and Good Government Political Action Committee," but would act as a sort of dog whistle for Scientologists, who would hear an echo of "Flag Land Base," the group's international headquarters in Clearwater, Florida.
According to memo released by Gawker, Coale’s plan outlined the lines of influence that would be needed.
  • Political- any political figure on a state or US level, local or national level. Such as senators, congressmen, local city officials, mayors, governors, members of parliament and councillors etc. It would include government officials, civil servant and tax and immigration officials.
  • Media- any media terminals such as owners or members of magazines or publishing houses, TV networks or stations, radio and wire services etc.
  • Judical/Legal - any justice department officials, judges, senior legal officials, senior partners in large or prestigious law firms.
  • Financial/ corporate- any members of the board or president, vice-presidents or other senior officials/ executives within banks or other financial institutions... Also financiers, stockbrokers and very wealthy individuals.
  • Entertainment/ Celebrity- any producers, directors etc in stage, motion picture or television.

Coale himself confirmed that he had developed the idea but, he adds, it had never really gotten much of a response. (Of course, he would say that). The question remains whether Coale’s free assistance in setting up her legal defense fund and her SarahPAC was not intended to be some part of this infiltration. Reviewing the list above, one can see how advantageous Van Susteren, through her contacts in Fox News, would be as a well-placed operative for the Scientology agenda.

As frightening (or absurd depending on your own opinion) this plan might sound, it should surprise nobody who has done any research on the Church of Scientology. Infiltration of government agencies has always been a primary goal of the cult. Here is a example from a one report:
In 1973, Hubbard authored a plan.. called "Snow White,"..to gain access to all federal agencies to obtain their files on Scientology. The name of this operation derived from Hubbard's opinion that once these agencies had their files "cleaned," they would be "snow white."
Infiltrating, or "penetrating," these agencies was achieved by having a Scientology agent obtain employment at an agency, then use his credentials to gain access to desired materials in the agency's files.
A report called Compliance Report lists 136 such agencies targeted for penetration, prioritized by a star system, i.e.,
* low priority,
** higher priority, and
*** highest priority.
Some of the ***agencies listed in this report are: the AEC, the CIA, the FBI, the FTC, the FDA, the IRS, the NSA, the US Air Force, the US Army, the US Attorney General, the DEA, the US Coast Guard, the US Department of Justice, the US Department of Labor, the US Department of State, the US Department of Treasury, the US House of Representatives, the US Department of Immigration and Naturalization, the US Marshall's Office, the US Navy, the US Post Office, the US Selective Service, and the US Senate.

In this report, several agencies, such as the IRS, the DEA, the US Coast Guard, and the US Department of Labor are marked: "Done."
And this plan was actually put into action. According to Wikipedia:
This project included a series of infiltrations and thefts from 136 government agencies, foreign embassies and consulates, as well as private organizations critical of Scientology, carried out by Church members, in more than 30 countries; the single largest infiltration of the United States government in history with up to 5,000 covert agents. The resulting investigation would eventually led to the arrest of eleven highly-placed Church executives, including Mary Sue Hubbard, wife of the founder..
Admittedly that was some time ago and, despite claims to the contrary, the membership has fallen a great deal. However, the extent of the infiltration and their determination makes them a force to take seriously.
Greta and John, Hilary and Bill ... and John Travolta
Author and filmmaker, Geoffrey Dunn, writing for Huffington Post, has investigated the Scientology connections in some depth and has made these interesting observations.
Coale was a major contributor to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, and then abruptly switched sides when Hillary was denied the nomination. There is an interesting notation in the FEC documents of a "negative" contribution, or withdrawal, from Clinton's campaign on August 28, 2008--the same date that Obama made his historic acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention.
 The following day, Palin was named as John McCain's running mate.From that point on, Coale dumped nearly $60,000 into the McCain-Palin campaign and the Republican National Committee, including a last-hour donation on New Year's Eve of $26,200 to the RNC. In respect to Hillary Clinton, not only did he contribute thousands of dollars to her ill-fated presidential run, he also contributed thousands to her 2000 race for the U.S. Senate.
It is a fair question to ask how a person can suddenly switch from the Left to the Far Right in a matter of a day. What was it about Hilary that attracted him so much that, when it was clear she would not be president, he was ready to switch completely his political allegiance and party?

After all, most people would agree that, besides being women, Hilary and Sarah have very little in common. And that was the way it was portrayed, that it revolved about feminism and putting women in power. Never mind that Palin was running as vice-president, not president.
Dunn cites another source to explain the possible reasons for the closeness between the Clintons and Coale. It has far less to do with political idealogy and much more to do with being a friend to the space opera cultists.

Dr. Stephen Kent, Department of Sociology, University of Alberta, Edmonton in his well-researched article, Hollywood Celebrity-Lobbists and the Clinton administration's American Foriegn Policy Toward German Scientology, describes how the Church of Scientology had undertaken a long term infiltration of the US government. Following its historic agreement with the IRS in 1993, Church leaders targeted legislators through intensive lobbying efforts.
(I)t set out to improve its image with politicians and the population at large by undertaking a major public relations effort in the nation's capitol. As part of this public relations effort, a Scientology affiliate in Los Angeles was paying "almost $725,000 to a Washington-based firm [Federal Legislative Associates] to lobby Congress in 1997 and 1996"
It didn't take long for their efforts to bear fruit. President Bill Clinton had developed a special -unusual- relationship with certain Hollywood stars, all of them Scientologists.

According to this report, certain celebrity Scientologists took their cause directly to President Clinton himself. Their request was that pressure be put on the German government to relax its policies on Scientology. Growing concern by authorities had convinced the German parliament the need to investigate the Church. Additionally there were numerous complaints of infiltration of the business and political structures, and charges of brainwashing (confinement and physical coercion) and harsh “re-education techniques,” which included social and psychological degradations, forced confessions, and hard physical labor. For these reasons, the German government singled out Scientology as a threat. As Kent puts it,
The German government's position, however, that Scientology was both non-religious and a potential threat to democracy brought it into direct conflict with its American counterpart.
German official were unprepared and puzzled by the American reaction on the restrictions.
A German state official raised the issue ... in response to a harsh "open" letter to Chancellor Helmut Kohl that equated the German government's handling of Scientology with Nazis' persecution of Jews prior to World War II. Published as a full page ad in the International Herald Tribune, thirty-four Hollywood personalities signed it, including actors Dustin Hoffman, Goldie Hawn, director Oliver Stone, writer Mario Puzo, and CNN talk show host, Larry King.
According to Kent’s sources, the Church of Scientology found an unlikely ally in the White House. John Travolta - a well-known member of the Church- managed to get the attention of then-president Bill Clinton at an April 1997 summit on volunteerism in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The Saturday Night Fever star was there "to present educational materials created by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard." The next day, Travolta met President Clinton who told him,
"Your program sounds great.... More than that..., I'd really love to help you with your issue over in Germany with Scientology"
Clinton informed Travolta that "he had a roommate years ago who was a Scientologist and had really liked him, and respected his views on it. He said he felt we were given an unfair hand in [Germany] and that he wanted to fix it."
And Clinton was as good as his word.
Clinton followed up on this conversation by going "to the extraordinary length of assigning his national security advisor, Sandy Berger, to be the administration's Scientology point person". In September 1997, when Travolta and Chick Corea were in Washington (presumably for their testimony before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe), Clinton "had White House political affairs director, Craig Smith, arrange a meeting between Berger, Travolta, and jazzman Chick Corea, also an avid Scientologist. According to a senior administration official, the straight-shooting Berger briefed Travolta on the administration's efforts in the same manner he would a senior senator.
In fact when news of this high level meeting broke, the State Department received some criticism and the White House was put into an uncomfortable position in defending Clinton’s decision. Others were not so quick to forgive and forget.
Europeans, ...likely saw the Clinton-arranged meeting in the context of other actions the American president had taken on behalf of Scientology. For example, the section of the State Department's 1996 human rights report that was harshly critical of Germany's actions towards Scientology "was written by the White House...." Its condemnation was so strong that Secretary of State Madeleine Albright apologized to the German government because of it.
So it doesn’t take too much imagination to understand why John Coale would have preferred to see Hilary Clinton in the White House. Anyway, how else can one explain Van Susteren’s defense of Bill Clinton during the long and painful Monica Lewinski scandal? Hadn't she left CNN by dropping off an angry at how badly women and minorities had been treated there? But now, here was, defending a president with a long history of womanizing and philandering. Why shouldn't that have also been "a woman's thing"?

The Seduction of Sarah
The Scientology connection can also explain why debt-ridden Sarah Palin appealed to Coale “charitable nature.” On the surface, it appears that the seduction of Sarah Palin, for one reason or anything, was put on hold. Or was this rejection- "throwing under the bus" as one newspaper called it- of Coale and his wife merely a bit of theater? Certainly, Greta Van Susteren hasn’t been any less fawning.
It's an intriguing question. Perhaps Van Susteren and Coale were drawn to Sarah Palin merely because of shared interests and compatible dispositions. After all, critics of Scientology have claimed that the church leaders are interested in only two things, Power and Money. If so, they might have found their own Joan of Arc.
Besides, it was, L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the the Church of Scientology that stated while outlining his training techniques.

"The only way you can control people is to lie to them.. because the second you start telling anybody close to the truth, you start releasing him and he gets tougher and tougher to control."

It appears that's the kind of philosophy would probably have appealed to the Palins.


--------------------------------------------

Please re-tweet:

If you are interested in learning more about the Church of Scientology, here is a fascinating BBC Panorama documentary on this subject. This is what good journalism is all about.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Sarah and Greta and John: The Scientology Connection 2/3

Part 1 http://goo.gl/p6tY9

Champions Greta and John
Now let’s take a small step back and examine the husband and the wife.

Born in Appleton, WI in 1955, Greta Van Susteren came from a family immersed in local politics. In fact, her father, Urban Van Susteren, was a County Judge in Wisconsin and was also a close friend of Sen Joseph McCarthy. And according to a biography, “he served as a  campaign manager for McCarthy's smear-filled 1946 campaign that won the Senate seat from Sen Robert M. La Follette, Jr., who killed himself several years later. While McCarthy was a Senator, he roomed in the Van Susteren house when he was not in the nation's capitol.” (Van Susteren addressed this issue in a blog post in which she correctly states that she was not even born when her father worked with McCarthy and she was just three when he died. Fair enough.)
Ms. Van Susteren’s academic background is impressive, at least, for a television show host. This is a summary from her Wikipedia bio.
Van Susteren graduated from Xavier High School in Appleton in 1972 and the University of Wisconsin in Madison in 1976, where she studied geography and economics. She later earned a law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 1979 and prior to the start of her television work returned to Georgetown Law as an adjunct faculty member in addition to her full-time legal career.

She began her journalist career working for CNN as a legal analyst, first covering the William Kenney Smith trial in 1991 and the O.J. Simpson trial.  Later she became  a co-anchor on the legal affairs news show, Burden of Proof, with political analyst Roger Cossack.  According to a  New York Times article, relations with CNN soured when, according to an angry letter written by Coale to CNN 's chairman, Walter Isaacson, Van Susteren  “accused new network executives of putting corporate interests above journalistic ones and slighting women and minorities while revamping the network -- accusations they denied.”

The letter said Ms. Van Susteren was treated as a "second-class citizen." As an example, it points to the the network's failure to secure an invitation for her to the White House Christmas party, which, Mr. Coale wrote, is an important gathering for forging relationships with administration officials.
After a bidding war in  2002,  she left CNN  to join Fox News.
Even before her immigration to Fox News, Van Susteren’s lawyerly approach- in which all facts are equal- was considered, by one observer, as “dishonest.”
Jonah Goldberg  in his article, Regrettable Van Susteren,  strongly criticized Van Susteren about her bias in the coverage of  both the O.J. Simpson trial and Bill Clinton’s sex scandal. (Rather surprisingly, throughout the Bill Clinton scandal, Van Susteren strongly and repeatedly defended the president.)   
Goldberg goes on to declare:
Greta Van Susteren, co-host of CNN's Burden of Proof and ubiquitous CNN legal analyst.. ... is, thanks to CNN's global presence, the international poster girl for all that is wrong with American political commentary.
So perhaps it wasn’t such a surprise that  Van Susteren would eventually wind up at Fox News. As an anchor at Fox Van Susteren, reportedly commands a seven figure salary annually according to at least one source .


For his part, John P. Coale, not unlike Sarah Palin, likes to think of himself as a crusader for the little guy. This mystique is primarily based on his multi-billion-dollar anti-tobacco lawsuits against Big Tobacco, which made him both wealthy and famous.
He has taken on other high-profile cases such as the Ritalin fraud and conspiracy against Novartis Pharmaceutical. (That trial would later turn out to be a fiasco when judges threw out the three of the five case, leaving the other two to be withdrawn quietly.)  
Coale represented victims in the Bhopal chemical accident in India as well. Attorneys noted that Coale could be found wherever there was a disaster. From the Du Pont Plaza Hotel fire in San Juan, to the 1996 Valuejet crash in the Everglades or an Amtrak crash in Maryland, Coale could be found, advising victims to hold out for the highest compensation.
Many found Coale’s methods, particularly his method of hunting down clients questionable.
In fact, both Coale and Van Susteren were found guilty of “ambulance chasing” by a bit too eagerly soliciting the families of coal-mine accident victims and were barred from practicing in West Virginia  for a year.
"As of April 1996, Coale, his wife Greta Van Susteren - who is also his partner in a law firm, and the law firm were all the subject of serious bar disciplinary proceedings in West Virginia, whose state bar's discipline board was seeking to suspend their right to practice law in West Virginia for a year as a result of soliciting prospective clients in ways prohibited by bar rules, generally referred to by the public as "ambulance-chasing"; in Coale's case, the term seems particularly appropriate because one of the incidents that landed him in trouble was his law firm's employee allegedly trying to chat up a severely-burned man in an intensive-care unit."
And there’s more from the Goldberg article:
American Lawyer magazine called him "a symbol for everything wrong with the plaintiff's bar."
Echoes of the comments made about Van Susteren.
In 1987 the same magazine awarded Coale its Most Frivolous Suit Award: He had sued his tailor, on the grounds that the sub-par work on his shirts had subjected him to "public humiliation . . . severe emotional distress, and embarrassment."
On the surface, Coale is something of a political contradiction . He was considered to be a  big Democrat player and was a huge supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton during the Democratic Primary. In fact, at one point, Coale proposed the idea that Palin's political action committee—the creation of which Coale had master-minded— make a symbolic $5,000 donation to the Clinton campaign to help her retire her debt. (It was a drop in the ocean.) He later attempted to arrange a meeting between Palin and Bill Clinton. (Imagine that if you can.)
The whole idea understandably sent shivers up the collective spine of Republican Party officials. Politico noted
Coale conceded that he urged Palin and her advisers to consider helping Clinton, but he said it was part of a larger campaign to align the Alaska governor with prominent women in politics, including Republicans Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, both of whom are prospects for elective office in California. “It was a women thing and not a Hillary thing,” said Coale, who was angered at what he saw as sexism aimed at Clinton during last year’s campaign and who has long taken an interest in promoting female politicians.
Basically, Coale was saying to the Republicans, “it’s a woman thing. You wouldn’t understand.”  He also claimed that he was trying to tone down the rhetoric by bringing both sides together.
“With these people from the opposite side, I’m trying to turn down the volume a bit on the attacks,” Coale said. “The more people meet each other and actually talk to each other, the volume will come down.”

Strange idea, since most of the inflammatory rhetoric- the volume- was coming from the Palin side. Another reason Coale gave for this most unlikely pairing was... connecting people.

Pam Pryor, a Washington-based Palin adviser, defended Coale, calling him a “networking hound” who was only trying to help connect friends.

Whether Palin was shy about becoming pals with Hilary, or whether she simply did not want to part with her earnings, the meeting- nor the kind act of charity for Hilary- never occurred. The former president also declined a meeting with Palin, according to Clinton spokesman Matt McKenna.

After repeated nudging by Coale,...Palin directed a staffer to turn him down via e-mail: 
"While we appreciate your efforts and recognize that a friendship with the Clintons is appropriate, the governor believes (and I concur) that using SarahPAC to pay down Hillary's debt is not a prudent use of the money. Contributors who chose between heating their homes and sending in a contribution because they believe in Sarah would be crushed."
The image of freezing Palin contributors is a remarkable contrast to the Republican National Committee spending more than $150,000 on clothing and make-up for Gov. Sarah Palin, her husband, and even her infant son. 
But of course, that wasn’t her money.  

Palin had other reasons, perhaps, for wanting to distance herself from too much contact with Coale. 

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Sarah and Greta and John: The Scientology Connection - Part 1/3

While I was perusing one of the many ethics complaints filed against Sarah Palin while she was Alaska’s governor, I stumbled upon an interesting bit of news that I hadn’t heard before. Among the many charges in the complaint filed by  fellow Republican Andree McCleod, there was the a familiar name, Greta Van Susteren, host of Fox News’ On the Record. 

Intimate Relations
The Palin- Van Susteren relationship is strikingly more intimate than most political figures have ever had with journalist.   At times, it seemed as though Van Susteren was more of a press agent for the former governor, rather than a “fair and balanced” journalist. As Andrew Halcro writes:   
Van Susteren landed Palin's first interview after she returned home from her Vice Presidential run in November and this past week Van Susteren landed the first public media appearance by the governor's daughter and grandson.From snowmobiling and cooking moose hot dogs in Wasilla, to greeting racers at the end of the Iron Dog in Fairbanks, Van Susteren has had more one on one face time with Palin than most State commissioners.Perhaps even more that Todd.
In a competitive industry like cable news broadcasting,  in which exclusive access is like hitting a home run in the ninth inning, Greta’s relationship with Sarah is a definite advantage. For Palin, it is just as much of an advantage. Media Matters supplies an example regarding Palin’s memoir, Going Rogue: An American Life :
Van Susteren hyped Palin's memoir throughout the first segment of her November 13 program, saying that the "entire country is buzzing" about the book and that "no one -- and we mean no one -- can stop talking about her." She also asked, "What is it about this governor that's got everybody talking?"
Even in our hype-filled age, that sounds a bit over the top. Although, when Greta’s gushing finally subsided, the guest makes some very interesting observations,  it’s hard not to read a bit of sarcasm in the guest’s remark, “Nobody has been more fair to her than you, Greta.”
In an online article, Think Progress lists the many not-so special specials that Van Susteren has hosted on Palin.
During the presidential campaign, Van Susteren had perhaps the best access to Palin of any journalist, hosting a one-hour “documentary” on “Governor Sarah Palin — An American Woman.” She also scored an exclusive interview with Todd Palin, in which she grilled him “on everything from the story behind the name ‘First Dude’ to how he feels about the name ‘First Dude.’”After the election, Palin chose Van Susteren for her first national television interview. Since then, Van Susteren has consistently covered Palin, keeping an eye out for any potential slights to the governor and gushing over her popularity.
It appears that Van Susteren, as Palin’s private cheerleader for Fox News, has decided that it is her job to keep the entire country buzzing about Palin, even when no one- and we mean no one- really finds her as enthralling as Greta does.  If Greta isn’t interviewing Palin then she is interviewing somebody who is talking (favorably) about Palin, her potential run for the presidency, and all things Palin. On  Aug 18, 2010,  When Fox News devoted three days to a Van Susteren hosted a special on oil drilling in Alaska, Greta was able to turn the “inside story” into a piece about Palins. The broadcast was summed up in this way by Media Matters, the special “basically boil[ed] down to a three-day infomercial of Palin touting her positions on ANWR and her record of ‘play[ing] hardball’ with oil companies as governor.”
Of course, this is what most people have come to expect from Fox News, really just business as usual. Still, such intimate relations might explain why comments highly critical of Palin made by Karl Rove on Van Susteren’s show were censored
During the Van Susteren interview, Rove was responding to a remark made on her SarahPAC site condemning professional pundits with so called “inside information” about her decision to run or not to run. The statement concluded with, “This is more of the "politics-as-usual" that Sarah Palin has fought against throughout her career.”
Rove, taken aback somewhat, defended himself and then observed,
Well look, it came from her PAC and I assume that since it’s a small group of people who run the PAC and run her operation and I assume that she was aware that they were going to go out there and say things in her name, SarahPAC, that basically said ‘Don’t speculate about me and if you are then you are an establishment elitist with no inside information.’
He continues with this comment,
And I mean I just thought that it was a very odd way to react and and frankly you know - OK fine: If you don’t want us to speculate about you, don’t be doing the things you are doing. By showing up in a surprise appearance at the Iowa State Fair and running a television ad saying “I’m looking forward to being back in Iowa” and then going and speaking at a big rally in Iowa. I thought that part of that was that she wanted to get more attention to herself but I guess, I guess that’s wrong. I guess that she wanted less attention so she did those things. I don’t know. It’s weird. Very odd.
Mind you, these statements by Rove were deleted in the official transcript. In any case, there is, in this dialogue, a bit more than meets the eye and a bit more to the story than the usual unbalanced news reporting so typical of Fox News.

Big Deal
According to the ethics complaint I mentioned earlier, starting in 2008, Palin, while still governor, received free professional consulting and legal advice on how to deal with lawsuits, ethics complaints and unfair attacks by the media. The complaint charged that these services constituted an gift which were not disclosed, in violation the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. The provider of this gift was none other than Van Susteren’s law partner and husband, John P. Coale.

When a Politico story broke about the Van Susteren-Coale connection, eventually Van Susteren admitted that her husband had indeed assisted Palin, in an article . In a blog post on her website GretaWire, she writes:

Yes, he advised her - after the election - how to set up a PAC (big deal - it is common - routine - for politicians to set up a PAC - virtually every politician has one set up and there is nothing wrong with them.And incidentally, the PAC was created to pay travel bills she had accumulated and would accumulate in the future and to contribute to other candidates .and the Pac was not to be her chief political advisers which is what the article accuses.) And yes, he thought it wrong the way she was attacked in the media.As a matter of fact, so did I think she was treated unfairly by the media (I don't like gratuitous attacks.issues, yes..but not gratuitous attacks) and I am not the only one who thought that in the media. My husband helped with the PAC - I did not - AFTER the election when she was not running for office but trying to dig herself out from lawsuits, ethics complaints and unfair attacks by the media. Big deal.  So he was nice to her and wanted to help her and did help her.
Don’t bother checking the link, though. She apparently had some second thoughts about being THAT open and scrubbed the post not long after this was written. .
The fact that there might be a small conflict of interest involved never seems to cross her mind. By listing other female new personalities with politically active spouses, Van Susteren goes to great pains to show that it is possible to remain objective and ethical. Possible in theory, perhaps. This dismissal rings rather hollow, given the fact that Van Susteren has treated no other politician in quite the same way as she treats Palin. When the subject of favoritism and Palin comes up, Van Susteren like to dismiss the claim by saying “Oh, we’ve had Hilary Clinton here a lot of times too.”

To an outsider, it would appear that the fee for Coale’s  legal advice was access to Sarah Palin. It was a very nice arrangement for all parties concerned.
Other Fox News staff are equally blase, as the New York Times reports:
Bill Shine, the senior vice president for programming, expressed little concern about the ties. “There are always some sort of, let’s just say, unique relationships that happen when you live in Washington,” he said in a telephone interview. “It’s the culture of that town.”He said Ms. Van Susteren did “not necessarily” have to disclose on television that her husband had worked with Ms. Palin.
Not what you would call an adamant statement. Other opinions were a bit less bland.
Some critics have accused Ms. Van Susteren of playing favorites with Ms. Palin. David Zurawik, a longtime television critic for The Baltimore Sun, wrote that she had conducted “cotton-candy interviews” of Ms. Palin. In an interview, he called Mr. Coale’s work “an extension of what Greta’s doing on the air.”“They’re her champions or her defense attorneys,” Mr. Zurawik said.

When the subject of favoritism and Palin comes up, Van Susteren likes to dismiss the claim by saying “Oh, we’ve had Hilary Clinton here a lot of times too.” In an interview, Van Sustern said she thought Hilary Clinton was the most powerful woman in the world. Be that as it may, later we shall see the other possible reasons why Susteren and her husband have worked hard to cultivate a good relationship with the Clintons.

-----------------------------------------------

Please re-tweet:


Related articles



Your Links